It also does not support non-RGB color spaces such as CMYK. This is why you might catch yourself asking which one you should use, WebP or PNG. WebP essentially combines the features of all other image formats together in a surprisingly seamless way.

The lossless compression of PNG image files is possible. They preserve the sharpness of complex graphics like maps, iconography, and floorplans. Also, PNG files keep their transparency, which is important when putting things on top of each other. As you can see, the lossy compression resulted in artifacts at a quality of 80.

Choose “to webp”

Therefore, despite its extensive browser support, it is hard to imagine that WEBP will become a dominant image format. You should only use JPEG over PNG if having a smaller file size is more important than image quality. SVGs are better in every technical aspect, from color depth to scalability.

webp vs png

I’ve read several articles within the last couple of years where they recommend using GIFs for small graphics like icons. It might have been true 5+ years ago, but not today. We used to use GIFs to illustrate quick how-to concepts here at TechStacker, because it’s fast and effective. Now we’re using WebM, which is better quality, faster, and easier to control than GIFs.


AVIF images offer a significant reduction in file size compared to JPEG, PNG and WebP. AVIF is currently supported by Google Chrome, Firefox, and Android. The AV1 image format is a new open-sourced and royalty-free optimized image format that supports any image codec. With generally better compression and excellent performance in low-fidelity and high appeal images , AVIF is a more versatile image format. Its compression and optimization goes even further than WebP.

It helps in the fact that we are sending less bytes down the wire but as for over all page load performance you can see below it’s not helping much or if any at all. To start the conversion, simply upload any number of WebP images to the converter area. The main pitfall of new formats like FLIF is the fact that web browsers don’t support them yet.

In addition, the fact that FLIF is a free open source format, has interesting advantages over the patented proprietary formats owned by the software giants. To convert previously uploaded images of any format to FLIF, simply set the file extension of Cloudinary’s on-the-fly transformation URLs to .flif. The following example URL delivers a FLIF version of an image uploaded to our demo account. As mentioned above, we also checked the effect of the original file size on the results. You can see the results in the following chart. The following chart shows the compression ratio compared to the original PNG images while the horizontal axis displays the percentile of the number of colors.

The battle of WebP vs JPEG

However, this AVIF image has much higher quality and attractiveness than the equivalent WebP file. It has much less blockiness and color-banding. So if you were to slightly decrease the quality of AVIF, equal to WebP then the file size of AVIF becomes significantly smaller. JPEG often written as JPG, is a lossy compression format, initially released in 1992. JPEG is commonly used in graphics applications like Photoshop and Illustration. JPEG is the standard file format for most digital cameras.

To test compression performance, every image was deliberately reduced in quality and then compared to the original in terms of quality and size. The higher the relative quality at the same relative size, the better the format handles lossy compression. It’s worth noting that image degradation becomes noticeable at around MS-SSIM of 0.90 to 0.95. “No compression” is defined as converting the original image to another format without any techniques for reducing size while sacrificing quality. Images inherently lose some quality when they are converted to other formats, yet all showed an average MS-SSIM of over 0.991, meaning an almost identical image .

The format is perfectly safe to use, and many websites already use this format. Courses Take a deep-dive into digital fundraising. Guides & Templates Free guides, how-to’s, and templates. Webinars Attend live or watch on-demand sessions with experts.

Compression AVIF vs WebP

A few studies suggest that WebP compresses data more efficiently than JPEG or JPEG 2000. The benefits of file size reduction are especially noticeable for smaller files. These are the most popular formats on the internet. So, in the case of WebP vs JPG, it seems like WebP is in the lead. But many articles state that JPEG may compress data better than WebP. We often see that WebP has issues with hiding out details.

JPEGs are compressed to reduce the file size, while PNGs are already compressible. PNG also supports transparent backgrounds, which makes it a suitable format for graphic design. Compressing our PNGs resulted in a 31.86% decrease in average image size. And remember, Optimus uses lossless compression, which means are images still look as sharp as they did before. But the exciting part is that WebP resulted in a 42.8% decrease in average image size. So in our scenario, just converting to WebP decreased our already compressed PNGs by another 11%.

SVGs are popularly used instead of JPEG, GIF and PNG images for icons, logos, cartoons and other graphics. When should you use JPG, PNG, GIF, SVG or WebP as your image file types? Not only is it crucial to know when to use which format in terms of quality it also has a huge impact on how fast your website loads. Today you’ll learn about the pros and cons of using either of the most popular web-image type formats. The main difference between WebP and PNG is that WebP is a newer image format with better compression, transparency support, and the ability to create animations. For these reasons, a WebP file may be a better choice than a PNG file for web graphics.

But that’s of course, still pretty far from being 100%, hence why I didn’t say “just use WebP” at the beginning of this article. WebP can be used on both graphics and photography. There are two PNG formats, PNG-8 & PNG-24, let’s break down the technical facts of both. File size JPEGs are significantly smaller than their PNG counterparts when you compare JPG and PNG of the same resolution.

WordPress Performance Team Puts Controversial WebP by Default … – WP Tavern

WordPress Performance Team Puts Controversial WebP by Default ….

Posted: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 07:00:00 GMT [source]

The Deflate compression algorithm, designed for PNG files, reduces the size of the saved image without losing the quality of the final image. PNG is equally readable by all types of modern browsers and graphic editors. This format is often used to store logos and icons thanks to its support for transparent backgrounds.

Upload, convert and transform FLIF images

A few modern image formats aim to solve this problem and provide the best algorithm for storing images losslessly in the most efficient way. This article was written to fill the glaring lack of knowledge and data regarding image compression and image format comparison. It focuses on resolving the dilemma, of which format is the best in terms of the smallest size with the highest quality. Serving small images ensures quick web page loading, while high quality keeps readers engaged. PNGs are mainly used for web graphics, logos, diagrams, and illustrations, while JPEGs are more commonly used for digital images.

webp vs png

The JPG or JPEG image type was named based on its creators, i.e., the Joint Photographic Experts Group. This image type was initially developed to facilitate simple image-based file sharing and can compress files up to 90%. The quality of the photo declines with compression. Web designers use the term “lossy” to describe this idea. Compressed photos can appear beautiful on websites because they don’t have sharp edges. The full form of PNG is Portable Network Graphics.

JPG and JPEG – Are Both the Same?

For instance these same animated images as their corresponding MP4’s and webm’s are a lot smaller. Typically in a situation like this I would use Webpagetest’s “visual comparison” option that way we could see the pages load side by side. I’d run a desktop test and then I’d run a mobile test using the “emerging markets” settings. I can’t right now since as mentioned above APNG support is in Chrome 59+. What most everyone using a non dev/beta version of Chrome uses.

Convert WebP to PNG (Photoshop)

WebP supports both lossy and lossless compression, and in both cases outperforms the competition in terms of image size and quality. On average, the weight of images is reduced by 25-35% and thus, this format is useful when storing a large number of images. WEBP images are becoming more popular and are supported in many popular browsers and photo editors.

You may use our online free converter tool to convert them to JPEG or PNG. Now, which is better for web, JPEG or PNG is a different question altogether. You may check webp vs png out our other articles for more information on that. There are several online tools that can convert AVIF files to more traditional file formats such as JPG.

Rate WebP to PNG Converter

Google announced WebP format as a new image file format in 2010. Like JPEG, WebP is a lossy compression format. However, WebP has better performance and compression efficiency than the JPEG format at the same image quality. Using WebP will significantly improve your website’s loading speed. Since it’s 25-35% smaller in file size than the typical JPEG image, an increasing number of website owners use WebP image format. PNG is a popular bitmap graphic file format used on the Internet and supports lossless compression technology and transparency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *